Showing posts with label Brandon Belt. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Brandon Belt. Show all posts

Saturday, April 23, 2011

Tim Hudson Dominates, Giants Lose

  • Tim Lincecum walked the first two batters of the game. Not a clean outing from him overall -- 6.1 IP, 6 K, 6 BB, 5 R...FIP at 3.96; the one positive: 73.3% GB rate, a skill that complements high BB/9.
  • On the other side of the mound, Tim Hudson was pretty dominant. 8.2 IP, 0 BB, 2.44 FIP. Yep, the Giants did not draw a single walk.
  • Pat Burrell and Cody Ross both looked pretty good, going 5 for 8 with a couple of doubles. The rest of the Giants' offense went 4 for 26, without any extra-base hits.
  • Tim Hudson only needed 13 pitches to get through the fifth and sixth innings.

Yeah, that's pretty much it. It's easy to say the San Francisco Giants have a capable offense when they're hitting home runs; but when they're not, their massive weakness shows -- on-base ability. They live and die with the long-ball, and unless it stops, they'll never have a "consistent" offense.

The Giants, coming into today's game, ranked seventh best in the majors in isolated power (ISO). However, they ranked eighth worst in BB% and OBP. See the problem? Here's where a guy like Brandon Belt becomes useful.



Follow SP on Twitter and become a fan on Facebook

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Keith Law's Top 100 Prospects of 2011

Today, Keith Law released his prospect rankings. An insider account is required to view them, but Brandon Belt made the list at 17, and Zach Wheeler came in at 36 (h/t 8th Inning Weirdness). Law also released his Giants top ten, and here's the list:

1. Brandon Belt, 1B
2. Zach Wheeler, SP
3. Gary Brown, OF
4. Francisco Peguero, CF
5. Charlie Culberson, 2B
6. Thomas Neal, OF
7. Ehire Adrianza, SS
8. Eric Surkamp, LHP
9. Heath Hembree, RHP
10. Tommy Joseph, C

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

LINK: Baseball America - SF Giants Top Ten Prospects

1. Brandon Belt, 1b
2. Zack Wheeler, rhp
3. Gary Brown, of
4. Francisco Peguero, of
5. Ehire Adrianza, ss
6. Brandon Crawford, ss
7. Thomas Neal, of
8. Charlie Culberson, 2b
9. Eric Surkamp, lhp
10. Tommy Joseph, c/1b

Monday, January 24, 2011

Notes: Vernon Wells, Buster Posey, Manny Ramirez

Friday, January 14, 2011

Notes: Reality Series, Non-Roster Invitees, Fanfest

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Notes: Wiffle Ball, Injuries, Promotional Schedule


Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Notes: Thomas Neal, WAR Grids, Minor League Splits

  • New Fangraphs tool! WAR Grids. I think I'll test it out with a relevant post some time soon...
  • On a similar note, if you love these kinds of things, you probably already know about WAR Graphs. If you have a Twitter account, you should definitely follow @WARGraphs, where they tweet links to interesting WAR Graphs.
  • If you enjoyed Mychael Urban's interview with Brandon Belt, he just did another one with Thomas Neal. Check it out. 
  • R.I.P. Minor League Splits
  • I just want to congratulate Dave Gershman, another passionate baseball blogger who broke the story of the Mets' signing of Taylor Tankersley
  • Lastly, Mychael Urban will be participating in the Ten Questions Q&A on this site. If you have anything you'd like me to ask him as one of the questions, just comment with your question idea, and I might ask it. 

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Peek at the Prospects: Thomas Neal

Thomas Neal
Position: OF
Opening Day Age: 23
John Sickels' Grade: B-
Fangraphs Estimated Peak WAR: 4.5
ZiPS Projection: .259/.325/.397
Twitter Account: @TdaddyNeal

After an incredible season in 2009 that saw Neal hit .337/.431/.579 in 129 games at high-A, he put up disappointing numbers in 2010 -- a .291/.359/.440 slash line in AA. Don't be discouraged by Neal's AA numbers, though. As When the Giants Come to Town points out, "After Thomas Neal's monster breakout season with San Jose in 2009, it was a good bet that no matter what he did on AA in 2010, it would have been a disappointment."

John Sickels had similar thoughts: "I know his season in the Eastern League may look a bit disappointing, but I think he could put up some huge numbers in the PCL in '11, and I still think he has a chance to be a non-star regular player."

In regards to Neal's "disappointing" season, it seems as though his numbers were a bit suppressed by park factors. His home ISO of .095 was significantly worse than his road ISO of .198, and he hit ten of his 12 home runs on the road.

Although Neal stole 11 bases at AA Richmond, he's not said to be very fast, with a speed rating of just 34. Rather, he's a smart baserunner, much like Brandon Belt. In terms of defense, he's played the vast majority of his games at left field, and probably profiles best there. As Marc Hulet says, "Defensively, Neal doesn’t have great range and his arm strength is just OK. He’s pretty much limited to left field."

Another reason to be excited about Neal: he seems to be a very sociable guy. Check out his Twitter account, where he's quite active.

--

Other posts in the PatP series:

Friday, January 7, 2011

Peek at the Prospects: Zach Wheeler

Zach Wheeler
Position: RHP
Opening Day Age: 20
John Sickels' Grade: B
Fangraphs Estimated Peak WAR: 5.0
ZiPS Projection: N/A
When the Giants Come to Town's review

Well, folks, I've done you a disservice, as I haven't been leading you to DrBGiantsFan's When the Giants Come to Town, a San Francisco Giants blog that is extremely well-informed about their farm system. His comments about Zach Wheeler, for example, describe the young prospect perfectly:

When ranking prospects, one has to consider both eventual ceiling and proximity to the majors. Obviously, a player closer to the majors is more likely reach his ceiling, whatever that ceiling is, than a player in the lower minors. I tend to weigh eventual ceiling more heavily than proximity to the majors. That creates a dilemma when comparing players like Brandon Belt and Zack Wheeler. Wheeler was the highest ranking prospect in the Giants system last year who has not graduated to the majors. Despite the early wildness and the injury, Wheeler did nothing to diminish his eventual ceiling as a prospect. The injury was not to his arm, and if anything his secondary stats suggest that his ceiling may be even higher than we thought when he was drafted. The question then, really, is not whether Wheeler stock has decreased, but whether Belt's stock rose so much that he surpassed Wheeler. I still think that Wheeler has the highest ceiling of any prospect in the Giants system, but Belt's ceiling is pretty sweet too, and Belt could be in the majors as soon at 2011 while Wheeler obviously has a way to go, leaving him open to injuries or regression. In my mind, it's a close call. Stay tuned!

We're all well aware of the greatness that is Brandon Belt, but the fact that DrBGiantsFan expects a higher ceiling out of Wheeler should say a lot.

Right now, Wheeler is a raw talent. He struggled with control in low-A in 2010, posting an atrocious 5.83 BB/9. However, that was accompanied by a magnificent 10.74 K/9, and the kid didn't allow a home run all season (58.2 IP). He's got the ability to induce groundballs (63% GB rate), which in addition to his strikeout rate, makes him extremely valuable. In terms of proximity to the majors, Wheeler's got some work to do. He is quite promising though. There's a reason he ranked second on Fangraphs' list of the top ten Giants prospects, and third on John Sickels' list.

--

Other posts in the PatP series:

Peek at the Prospects: Ehire Adrianza

Ehire Adrianza
Position: SS
Opening Day Age: 21
John Sickels' Grade: C+
Fangraphs Estimated Peak WAR: 3.5
ZiPS Projection: .232/.295/.311

Ehire Adrianza is an excellent defensive shortstop. As Marc Hulet of Fangraphs says, "In the field, he displays outstanding range, excellent hands, and a solid arm." How he will perform offensively, however,
remains to be seen. While he displays excellent plate discipline -- a 9.3% BB rate over the past two seasons -- he lacks power. He does have good speed though, having stolen 33 bases in high-A last season. Ultimately, his upside appears to be as an Elvis Andrus-type player: outstanding fielder, good speed (although he certainly won't steal as much as Andrus), weak power, good plate discipline.

The ultimate consensus with Adrianza is great defense, questionable offense...as Hulet states, "At worst, he should develop into a solid utility player or a Cesar Izturis-type middle infielder."

John Sickels: "Love the glove, but not sure he'll hit enough to get beyond a utility spot."

I like what Adrianza brings to the system. It'd be nice to have his speed, and if he can hit like a league average shortstop in addition to playing excellent defense, he could be quite valuable.

--

Other posts in the PatP series:

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Peek at the Prospects: Brandon Belt

The internet is rife with analysis on the Giants' top prospects -- most notably Fangraphs and Minor League Ball. On January 26, Baseball America will release their San Francisco Giants Top Ten Prospects Scouting Reports. Leading up to that, I thought I'd take a peek at various Giants prospects, referencing the analysis from Fangraphs, Minor League Ball, and the Giants 2011 ZiPS projections. For now, I plan on looking at the following players (in no particular order):


It's very possible that I'll expand the list, however, and look at others like Hector Sanchez, Jorge Bucardo, Chuckie Jones, etc.

Without further ado, I'll begin with the guy at the top of every Giants prospect list....Brandon Belt

--

Position: 1B
Opening Day Age: 22
John Sickels' Grade: A-
Fangraphs Estimated Peak WAR: 5.5
ZiPS Projection: .266/.357/.440


Belt is the cream of the crop when it comes to the Giants' farm system. He rapidly rose through the Giants' minor league system last year, raking to the tune of .352/.455/.620 slash line in A, AA, and AAA combined. Thanks to mechanical adjustments in his plate approach, the 2009 fifth-rounder was able to display a combination of excellent plate discipline, contact skills, and power. He even stole 22 bases last season; make no mistake, though -- as Marc Hulet of Fangraphs notes, "he succeeded on the base paths due to smart base running as opposed to blazing speed." Belt is the real deal, and should be ready to make an impact in the majors right away in 2011.

I think the following comments speak for themselves...
"Oh yeah, ZiPS loves Brandon Belt and at least in the short term has him as the best 1B prospect in baseball." - Dan Szymborski
"Totally legitimate in my opinion, and second-only to Eric Hosmer among first base prospects." - John Sickels

For more on Belt, check out his interview with Mychael Urban.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

San Francisco Giants - 2011 ZiPS Projections

Dan Szymborski released his 2011 ZiPS projections.

Highlights for me:
  • Nate Schierholtz is projected to hit better than Mark DeRosa. This is no surprise, obviously, with DeRosa coming off of wrist surgery, but it's still interesting. If there's an outfield spot open, I'd much rather see the trio of Ross/Torres/Schierholtz out there than DeRosa/Torres/Ross. 
  • Brandon Belt: .266/.357/.440 
  • Freddy Sanchez...he's aging, but I think he can do better than his projection of .278/.320/.386

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Giants Re-Sign Pat Burrell

The Giants have re-signed Pat Burrell to a one-year $1MM deal without incentives. Ah, how refreshing. I'm one of the first to doubt Burrell -- after seeing him strike out 11 times in 13 at-bats in the 2010 World Series, I just can't even tell if he's the same player that saw a resurgence a few months prior. Or maybe it's the fact that he has more World Series rings (2) than hits (1). He has one hit in 27 career World Series at-bats.

Whatever. He'll be making $1MM without incentives. He's pretty much guaranteed to be worth that $1MM. Even if he's just a bench bat, and manages to come off the bench and get a few important hits, he'll be worth it. And there's high reward -- if he does play like the Pat the Bat of June 2010 (.338/.405/.615), he'll be extremely valuable.

I can't think of a possible scenario where this contract hurts the Giants. I honestly can't. It's $1MM, and I'm pretty sure that Burrell will be a better left-fielder than Mark DeRosa coming off of wrist surgery. DeRosa wasn't even good for the Giants before that wrist injury -- .194/.279/.258...this, hopefully, puts him back in the utility role, a role he's better suited for. A good chunk of his value is dependent on his being able to play multiple positions, so hopefully he'll be doing that now...

Lastly, I think this contract seals Travis Ishikawa's fate. I don't know how the Giants would find a spot for him on the roster, barring an injury. The way I see it, here are their starters:

C Posey
1B Huff
2B Sanchez
3B Sandoval
SS Tejada
LF Burrell
CF Torres
RF Ross

And their bench...

C Whiteside
OF Rowand
OF Schierholtz
UT DeRosa
IF ________ (probably not Fontenot...who knows...maybe Rohlinger? or Burriss?)
And then, eventually, Brandon Belt at 1B.

I don't know what will happen to Ishikawa. It's kind of a shame. If his bat were just a little bit better, he could be a JT Snow-type player. He's a great defensive first baseman. But first basemen just aren't in high demand.

If this is, indeed, the end of the line for Travis, he shall be remembered as the tying run in Game Three of the NLDS.

Friday, November 26, 2010

Twins Win Bidding for Nishioka. Good News for Giants?

The Twins have won the bidding for Japanese middle-infielder Tsuyoshi Nishioka. This could be good news for the Giants, though.

Nishioka is said to be a better fit at second base, but the Giants are looking for a guy who can play shortstop well. In 2010, Nishioka posted a slash line of .346/.423/.482, but that was in all likelihood a big fluke, as he had a BABIP of .389... Before that, his previous best was .300/.366/.463...This article by Patrick Newman of Fangraphs basically likens Nishioka to Chone Figgins and Ryan Theriot, both of whom had unimpressive campaigns in 2010. So Nishioka isn't that great...throw in the fees for bidding and signing him to a contract, and it's definitely too high of a price to pay for a relatively weak shortstop.

The good news here is that this increases the likelihood that J.J. Hardy becomes available on the trade market. Hardy is one of the best shortstop options currently available: he's one of the best defensive shortstops in the majors, with a career UZR/150 of 11.0, and his bat has great offensive upside. From 2007-2008, Hardy belted a total of 50 home runs, although he hasn't come near those numbers in the past couple of seasons. However, his Bill James projections see him hitting .263/.328/.425 next year with 16 home runs. Throw in the superb defense that he'll inevitably provide, and that is an extremely valuable shortstop. Even with his .268/.320/.394 slash line in 101 games in 2010, he managed to produce 2.4 WAR. Project that over a full season and his 2010 worth is at 3.5-4.0 WAR. But he's projected to improve upon those numbers. At this point, the Giants probably wouldn't even have to give up much to get him.

His excellent defense and significant offensive potential warrant serious consideration. A lineup of Buster Posey, Aubrey Huff, Freddy Sanchez, J.J. Hardy, Pablo Sandoval, Mark DeRosa, Andres Torres, and Cody Ross is a legitimate offense. Pair that with the incredible rotation that the Giants have, and I think they have the tools to win many games. And that's not even considering the eventual call-up of Brandon Belt.

Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Aubrey Huff signs two-year deal

Aubrey Huff just re-signed with the San Francisco Giants on a two-year $22MM deal (with a $10MM club option for 2013 -- $2MM buyout). I like this contract a lot...

$10MM a year is not too much money. If Huff can meet his Bill James projections of .269/.348/.453 and play decent defense (maybe just a little above average), he'll be worth it. The Giants can use him as the starting first baseman until Brandon Belt is major-league ready, and at that point they can move Huff to the outfield. It's of course a risk, as Huff might not be able to play good defense in the outfield as he did in 2010, but it's a risk that the Giants will take. For $10MM, Huff's worth it. After all, the guy did finish 7th in NL MVP voting.

As recently as 2009, Huff had an atrocious season, putting up a slash line of .241/.310/.384...there is of course, the risk that he could return to being this hitter. Therefore, a two-year deal is perfect. Huff earned a good contract like this with his play, but anything more than two years is a big risk. He's getting older, as easy as that is to forget, and the Giants have a future star first baseman in Brandon Belt.

And the option -- of course, if Huff does maintain his 2010 performance level for the next couple of years, the Giants can choose to exercise his option, and keep him for 2013 at $10MM.

To sum it up, I am very satisfied with this contract. It gives Huff the money he deserves, but at the same time, not too much money. It also gives him the years he deserves, but allows the Giants to cut off ties with him by 2013, in case he does see a decline. Anyway, glad to have him back. Great clubhouse guy, impact bat, and his defense is better than most say it is.

Wednesday, November 17, 2010

Brandon Belt

In case you haven't heard of Brandon Belt, it's about time. He's an up-and-coming star in the Giants farm system that could very well be an integral part of the San Francisco Giants in 2011. As of now, he's playing in the Arizona Fall League, and enjoying success, as he did all season long...
An AFL title would just be the cherry on the top of what was an extraordinary debut season by any measurement. The 2009 fifth-round pick led the Minor Leagues with a 1.075 OPS (on-base plus slugging percentage). He finished second in batting average (.352) and on-base percentage (.455) while ending up fourth in RBIs (112) and seventh in slugging percentage (.620). He did it while playing across three levels, starting with Class A Advanced San Jose and finishing in Triple-A Fresno.
Belt exhibits an impressive combination of power, contact, plate discipline, and a little bit of speed: in three levels of the minor leagues this year, he put up a .352/.455/.620 slash line, hit 23 home runs, walked 93 times in 595 plate appearances, and despite the fact that he's primarily a first baseman, he stole 23 bases.

It's easy to get caught up in the Brandon Belt hype, because the numbers he's produced consistently all season long are quite amazing. He also seems to be a very likable player...for example, here's what MLB.com writer Jonathan Mayo had to say about him:
Still, there's a humility in how Belt speaks about what's happened in 2010. He got the chance to play in the AFL Rising Stars Game -- the best of the best -- and showed some serious plate discipline (not to mention the respect of opposing pitchers) by drawing three walks. While Belt clearly feels he belongs in this rarified air, he does so without any sense of entitlement.
After thoroughly examining his 2010 season, I am going to make a bold claim. I think Brandon Belt will be the  2011 Rookie of the Year. I've even made a Facebook fan page...Granted, he'll have to receive adequate playing time -- even Posey cut it close in the Rookie of the Year by missing the first couple months of the season (it certainly gave competitor Jason Heyward the upper hand). But Belt appears to possess a unique skill-set that could easily see him as a starting first baseman in 2011. 

I'll admit, I've gotten a little too caught up in the hype. But after seeing what Tim Lincecum, Buster Posey, and Madison Bumgarner have been able to do in the majors thus far, I believe Belt can emulate their success.


More about Brandon Belt to come...

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Marlins Plan on Trading Uggla

According to Ken Rosenthal, the Florida Marlins plan on trading 2B Dan Uggla after failed extension talks. The San Francisco Giants, of course, are listed as one of the eight potential suitors for the 2010 Silver Slugger. Many Giants fans are salivating at the idea of acquiring the two-time all star, but there's plenty of reasons not to go after him.

First of all, there's no room for him. As long as Pablo Sandoval gets in shape, and Freddy Sanchez remains injury-free, third base and second base are occupied. There is of course, a vacant starting job at first base, but that will likely go to Aubrey Huff. Many fans might wish to see Uggla starting at third instead of Pablo, but I'm sure he'd put up similarly great numbers -- he could easily hit above .300 with solid power (maybe 25 homers).

Secondly, he's costly. Uggla will likely get $10MM this year and then his contract is up. So what do the Giants do then? Sign him to an extension? He already turned down a 4yr/$48MM extension offer from the Florida Marlins, so what does this mean? He could make a huge dent in the Giants payroll for the next several years.

Third of all, his defense is atrocious. His career UZR/150 is -4.5, but in recent years, his defense has gotten even worse. He'll likely move to first base within a few years. That's huge. The reason he is so valuable is because his offensive production is rare, coming from a second baseman. If he moves to first base, he loses a lot of that value. Also, the Giants have an up-and-coming first baseman in their farm system by the name of Brandon Belt. The Giants probably want to have a spot available for him when he's called up to the majors -- rather than occupying first base for the next four to five years.

This isn't even including what the Giants would potentially give up to have Uggla for one year. They'd likely have to part ways with one or more great prospects -- a myopic move for any GM of a team that has just won the World Series.

So anyway, there's no need for Dan Uggla. The Giants could get great offensive production out of Pablo Sandoval for a much, much, much lower cost. And Uggla is expensive -- it would not be wise for the Giants to take on his contract unless they're going to make him an everyday player. Lastly, his defense is just bad. If they were to put him at first base, assuming they don't re-sign Huff, there will be no room for the promising Brandon Belt when he receives his call-up.

Friday, November 12, 2010

Is Carlos Pena a Good Fit for the San Francisco Giants?

Mychael Urban thinks that Carlos Pena would be a good fit for the Giants:
"I’m not saying that Pena, 32, is a rock star. I’m just saying his overall package, which includes a relentlessly upbeat personality that’s played well in every clubhouse he’s inhabited, represents a decent Plan B should Huff find a better deal elsewhere -- and perhaps even if Huff comes back and gets moved to a corner OF spot."
I don't so much have a problem with that statement as I do this one:
"After all, Pena’s a year younger than Huff was when he signed with the Giants coming off a down year, and look at the way Huff bounced back. Who’s to say Pena, who likely won’t command a salary any bigger than the reported $3 million Huff got for 2010, can’t be the Huff of 2011?"
Aubrey Huff and Carlos Pena are two pretty different hitters. Mainly, Huff strikes out about half as often as Pena. As a result, Huff usually hits for a decent average, whereas Pena seems to always hover around the Mendoza line. And Pena, as opposed to Huff -- whose best season arguably came in 2008, two years before coming to the Giants -- has shown a steady decline in numbers over the last several seasons:

Year G BA OBP SLG
2007 148 .282 .411 .627
2008 139 .247 .377 .494
2009 135 .227 .356 .537
2010 144 .196 .325 .407

Many people think that Pena will command around a 2yr/$16 million salary. Is that low-risk? Not by any means. I'd personally be surprised to see a contract that big, given how crowded the first base market is (Paul Konerko, Adam Dunn, Aubrey Huff, Russell Branyan, Derrek Lee, Nick Johnson, Adam LaRoche, Lance Berkman, and Lyle Overbay to name a few...); but if this is the kind of deal he's looking for, it would not be wise to go after him.

The young phenom Brandon Belt has worked his way through the Giants farm system, and will likely be in the majors in 2010. He'll either be playing outfield or first base, and having Pena (along with Huff, Torres, Ross, Schierholtz, Rowand, Ishikawa) could make it very difficult for the Giants to clear some room for the promising star.

Oct 2, 2008; St. Petersburg, FL, USA; Carlos Pena of the Tampa Bay Rays catches the throw at first base to force out the batter during the game as the Tampa Bay Rays take on the Philadelphia Phillies in Game #1 of the World Series at Tropicana Field. Roy Betancourt/Image of Sport Photo via Newscom Photo via Newscom
Carlos Pena
The other clear problem is that given Pena's power numbers, Bruce Bochy might get the urge to stick him in the middle of the lineup. That could prove disastrous, as sticking a guy who strikes out once every three at-bats could greatly hinder the production of the middle of the lineup. I picture Pena stepping to the plate -- possibly in the cleanup spot -- in a key two-out situation and going down whiffing on three straight pitches. While he has potential, the contract he could command, his steady decline in production, and the promise of Brandon Belt are all reasons that I'd be cautious of signing Pena.

Maybe if the Giants don't resign Huff (which I doubt will happen), Pena could be considered. But I find the notion that he could be a good option "perhaps even if Huff comes back and gets moved to a corner OF spot" to be a little ridiculous.

This, of course, doesn't even take into account whether or not he would perform well at AT&T Park. For a left-handed hitter whose value is almost entirely reliant on hitting home runs, that giant right-field wall might not be so great for him. It worked for Huff and Bonds, who do/did more than just hit home runs. But I'm skeptical as to whether or not AT&T Park would pan out well for Pena.

Saturday, August 14, 2010

Future Focus

September call-ups will be in a few weeks, so I thought it would be interesting to see the projections for possible September call-ups. I used a Minor League Equivalency Calculator to figure out what their stats might be in the majors, based on their performance thus far. This is of course all theoretical, but it might still be interesting to see:

These are the projections (note - they clearly will not get this many AB in the majors this year). Belt is currently with the AA Richmond Flying Squirrels, but the other four are in Fresno AAA:

Jesus Guzman: 358 AB, 41 R, 96 H, 14 2B, 12 HR, 41 RBI, 25 BB, 51 K, .269/.316/.412


Brett Pill: 430 AB, 42 R, 102 H, 24 2B, 12 HR, 57 RBI, 19 BB, 60 K, .239/.272/.380


Tyler Graham: 274 AB, 41 R, 84 H, 17 2B, 2 HR, 29 RBI, 18 BB, 45 K, .307/.339/.397, 30 SB, 9 CS


Emmanuel Burriss: 185 AB, 14 R, 48 H, 7 2B, 0 HR, 11 RBI, 7 BB, 19 K, .258/.284/.302, 5 SB, 6 CS


Brandon Belt: 144 AB, 15 R, 39 H, 6 2B, 5 HR, 24 RBI, 11 BB, 31 K, .274/.328/.483

Other notable names that I didn't do calculations for:

Conor Gillaspie, Richmond Flying Squirrels, .292/.342/.419


Thomas Neal, Richmond Flying Squirrels, .293/.361/.437

I have no idea whether any of these players will be called up. The Giants do appear to have a promising future, though, in terms of hitting.